AI Video Sensei

Editorial & Testing Policy

Last updated: July 8, 2026

Every article on AI Video Senseifollows the same standard. This page describes it, so you know exactly what you're reading and why you can rely on it.

1. First-hand testing comes first

We run active production channels and client work on the tools we cover. Workflow claims (settings, prompting rules, cost figures, failure modes) come from our own paid generations — not vendor marketing. Where we haven't personally tested something, the article says so explicitly.

2. Fact-checking and sources

Product facts — pricing, commission rates, feature availability, platform policies — are checked against official sources (vendor documentation, published terms, official announcements) at the time of writing. Each article carries a published date and an updated date; the updated date reflects the last time its facts were reviewed.

3. AI tools in our process, humans in charge

We use AI in our research and drafting workflow — the same way we use it in video production. Every published article reflects our own testing, structure, verdicts and editing, and a human is accountable for every claim. We never publish auto-generated content without review, and our rankings and verdicts are decided by results, not by who pays us.

4. Affiliate independence

Some tools pay us commissions; several tools we recommend pay us nothing. Verdicts are decided before monetization is considered — when a paying tool loses a comparison, it loses in print. Details in our affiliate disclosure.

5. Updates and corrections

AI tools change weekly, so we re-test and refresh cornerstone articles on a rolling basis, and we prioritize corrections over new content. Spotted an error? Email mandargovekar2507@gmail.com — verified corrections ship within 48 hours and we credit the reporter on request.

6. What we will not publish